ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Live and learn: unexpected benign disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the incidence of unexpected benign (UB) disease in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for suspected malignancy and investigates preoperative factors that may help differentiate benign from malignant disease. A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients who underwent PD for suspected periampullary or pancreatic malignancy (2011-2022). Demographic data, imaging findings, tumor markers, and postoperative outcomes were assessed, with comparison between UB and confirmed malignancy (CM) cases. UB disease accounted for 2.5% of PDs (16 patients). The median Ca19.9 level in UB group was 10.1 U/mL, with 25% above 37 U/mL. None of the six UB patients with a double duct sign had elevated Ca19.9. In contrast, 59.9% of CM patients had Ca19.9 > 37 U/mL (p = 0.005), confirming an independent predictor of malignancy (p = 0.001). CM patients required more preoperative biliary stenting than UB (57.3% vs. 31.5%, p = 0.038). UB patients had higher reoperation rates (37.5% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.001) then CM, but shared similar mortality rates (p = 0.106). UB disease after PD was infrequent and lower than prior reports (5-10%). Elevated Ca19.9 levels and the need for preoperative biliary stenting are predictor of malignancy. A multidisciplinary team approach with critical imaging assessment is crucial for improve diagnosis and minimize unnecessary resections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41138022What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.