ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
The CT-based deep learning model outperforms traditional anatomical classification models in preoperatively predicting complications and risk grade in partial nephrectomy.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA deep learning model integrating CT radiomics and clinical features was developed to predict perioperative complications and risk grade in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy, and was compared to traditional anatomical classification models.
methodsBetween June 2014 and July 2024, 1214 patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma or renal cysts who underwent partial nephrectomy were included. A deep learning model incorporating CT radiomics (segmented by nnU-Net and extracted by pyradiomics) and clinical features was developed. Logistic regression models using RENAL or PADUA scores were also developed for comparison. An external validation cohort (n = 260) was used to assess the model's generalizability.
resultsIn predicting complications, the deep learning model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95%CI: 0.80-0.93), outperforming the RENAL (0.68, 95%CI: 0.60-0.70) (p < 0.001) and PADUA models (0.69, 95%CI: 0.55-0.71) (p < 0.001). For risk grades, the deep learning model outperformed RENAL/PADUA models for the no-risk group (AUC = 0.83 [95%CI: 0.81-0.87] vs. 0.68 [95%CI: 0.58-0.71], p = 0.01; 0.66 [95%CI: 0.65-0.67], p < 0.001) and low-risk group (AUC = 0.79 [95%CI: 0.75-0.82] vs. 0.64 [95%CI: 0.60-0.74], p = 0.03; 0.66 [95%CI: 0.63-0.73], p = 0.04). However, no significant differences were found for moderate- and high-risk groups (p > 0.05). In the external validation cohort, the model achieved a prediction accuracy of 0.854 and an AUC of 0.83.
conclusionThe CT-based deep learning model showed superior performance in predicting complications and risk grades for no-risk and low-risk patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. No significant differences were found for moderate- and high-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41137930What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.