ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2026
The validity of the information on date of diagnosis of intracranial tumors in the Swedish cancer register.
Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the validity of information on the date of diagnosis of intracranial tumors in the Swedish National Cancer Register. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was conducted in Region Stockholm, covering approximately 2.4 million inhabitants. Data from the Image and Function Service (BFT) archive, which contains a population-based database of all diagnostic radiology in the Stockholm Region, was used. The study included all primary cases of intracranial tumors (ICD10 codes C70 and C71) reported from Stockholm to the National Cancer Register from 2010 to 2020. Radiology reports from CT and MRI exams performed from 2000 to 2020 were reviewed. Reports from exams conducted more than one month before the Swedish Cancer Register diagnosis were manually examined to validate the date of diagnosis.
resultsFor 98.8% of the brain tumor patients and 96.2% of the meningioma patients, the date of first radiological diagnosis was one month or less prior to date of diagnosis in the Swedish Cancer Register. Of the patients with radiological diagnoses more than one month prior to cancer register diagnosis, 30 patients (1.0%) had tumors reported to the register one month to one year after radiological diagnosis, and 36 patients (1.2%) had tumors reported more than one year later.
conclusionThe study found that for patients from the Stockholm Region with intracranial tumors reported to the Swedish Cancer Register during the period 2010 through 2020, date of diagnosis is highly accurate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.