ArticleNeuroscience bulletin2026
Exploring Empathic Responses to Others' Positive and Negative Experiences: Insights from Empathy Subprocesses.
Article in Neuroscience bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The MPOA-VTA Pathway: From Pup Care to Adult Helping.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
- Neural network dynamics underlying the bottom-up perception and top-down regulation processes of empathy.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Empathy can be categorized into positive and negative empathy depending on the emotional valence experienced. When responding to others' emotions, empathy involves three key subprocesses: emotion recognition, affective empathy, and motivational empathy. However, how these subprocesses operate to realistic positive versus negative stimuli remains largely unexplored. To fill this gap, we selected 96 real-life events with detailed contextual information and collected functional magnetic resonance imaging data. We observed lower within-subject and between-subject behavioral and neural similarity for positive empathy than for negative empathy. Although positive and negative empathy partially shared neural mechanisms underlying emotion recognition-evident in overlapping encoding regions and functional connectivity (FC)-they diverged notably in affective and motivational empathy. Negative empathy involved more complex encoding schemes and more convergent FC than positive empathy. These findings deepen our understanding of empathy dynamics, highlighting its multifaceted nature and the importance of distinguishing between positive and negative emotions in empathy research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.