ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025
Pesticide residues in fruits from Riyadh markets: a three-year evaluation.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fruits are most commonly subjected to pesticide treatments both pre- and post-harvest, which has led to concerns regarding consumer safety. This study aimed to evaluate pesticide contamination in fruits over three years (2020 to 2022), covering a wide diversity (33 types) of fruits and a large sample size (76,290 samples). The LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS analyses showed that only 2.1% (1,596 samples) of fruits tested exceeded the maximum residue limits (MRLs), and only 17.8% (13,568 samples) contained detectable residues below MRLs; the majority, 80.1% (61,126 samples), were free of detectable pesticide residues or below 0.01mg/kg. Temporal trends over the three years showed that pesticide contamination levels remained relatively stable. Fungicides were the most frequently detected contaminants to exceed MRLs (53.2%; P < 0.001). Within each separate pesticide category, the most significantly and frequently detected pesticides (P < 0.001) were also identified: imazalil (17.4%) in the fungicide category, chlorpyrifos (24.2%) in the insecticide category, bifenthrin (57.5%) in the insecticide & acaricide category, ethofumesate (60.0%) in the herbicide category, and propargite (98.0%) in the acaricide category. In terms of the types of fruits tested, mandarin and buckthorn were identified as the fruits most frequently contaminated with pesticide residues below and above the MRLs, respectively. Also, lemons showed the highest frequency of pesticide contamination at elevated concentrations. These results highlight the importance of focusing on certain fruit types and pesticide categories to ensure food safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.