ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Recurrent Embolic Strokes in Mechanical Aortic Valve: Diagnostic and Management Challenges.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecurrent embolic strokes without an identifiable source in patients with mechanical heart valves pose a significant diagnostic challenge. CASE SUMMARY: A 59-year-old woman with a mechanical aortic valve experienced recurrent embolic strokes, the first nearly 7 years after implantation during subtherapeutic anticoagulation. Repeated neurologic and cardiac imaging, thrombophilia screening, and prolonged rhythm monitoring failed to identify a definitive embolic source. Fluoroscopy and computed tomography showed discrete leaflet opening restriction. Multifocal infarctions raised clinical suspicion for mechanical valve thrombosis, prompting surgical exploration that confirmed diagnosis. The valve was replaced with a bioprosthesis, and left atrial appendage occlusion was performed. The patient remained event-free at 8-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Mechanical valve thrombosis is rare and often undetectable. This case highlights the diagnostic dilemma and importance of multidisciplinary team evaluation. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Recurrent embolic strokes in mechanical valve patients with inconclusive testing should prompt multidisciplinary evaluation and consideration of valve replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.