Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137764›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental ophthalmology

Predictive Correction Model for Corneal Back Surface Astigmatism With IOLMaster700 Keratometry Data in a Cataractous Population.

Achim Langenbucher, Peter Hoffmann, Alan Cayless, Nóra Szentmáry, Kamran Riaz, Damien Gatinel, Oliver Findl, Seth Pantanelli, Tun Kuan Yeo, Giacomo Savini and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Achim LangenbucherDepartment of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg (Saar), Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9175-6177
Peter HoffmannAugen-und Laserklinik Castrop-Rauxel, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany.
Alan CaylessSchool of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Nóra SzentmáryDepartment of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg (Saar), Germany.
Kamran RiazDean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1090-5025
Damien GatinelRothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
Oliver FindlVienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS), Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Seth PantanelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4992-9606
Tun Kuan YeoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Giacomo SaviniIRCSS Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Jascha WendelsteinDepartment of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg (Saar), Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4145-2559

Funding

Fondazione RomaItalian Ministry of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop and validate various models to predict total keratometry (TK) power vector components TKC0 and TKC45 from classical keratometry (K) KC0 and KC45 based on a large dataset of pre cataract surgery IOLMaster 700 measurements.

methodsRetrospective cross-sectional multicentric study evaluating a dataset containing 13 6378 IOLMaster 700 measurements including K and TK. Left eyes were mirrored about the facial axis. Based on 80% training data, we developed a global and segmented constant model (CM and CMS), a global and segmented (according to the angle A1 of the flat keratometric meridian) linear model (LM and LMS), a harmonic model (HM) and compared these to a classical constant (CMR) and linear models (LMR) segmented into with-the-rule, against-the-rule and oblique astigmatism. The performance was cross-validated using the root-mean-squared model fit error (RMSE).

resultsIn the 20% test data, RMSE was 0.173 D before correction and was reduced by 40%-42% to 0.100 and 0.104 D with the correction models. The segmented models performed slightly better than the global models, and the linear models performed slightly better than the constant models. With the individually adjusted changepoints, the CMS and LMS performed slightly better than the reference models CMR and LMR. There was no systematic difference between the RMSE with training and test data, indicating no overfit of the models.

conclusionAs the performance is quite similar for all tested correction models, we recommend using a simple global constant model to predict TK vector components. This could easily be implemented in any consumer software.

Indexed as

AstigmatismCataractCorneaCorneal TopographyAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRefraction, OcularReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studiescross‐validationkeratometryprediction of total corneal powerpredictive correction modeltotal keratometry

Identifiers

PMID41137764
PMCPMC12886594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.