Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137744›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

A Toaster in the Bathroom: Neural Correlates of Semantic Construction During Episodic Memory Recall.

Carina Zoellner, Rebekka Heinen, Nicole Klein, Nora A Herweg, Christian J Merz, Oliver T Wolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carina ZoellnerDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0775-2147
Rebekka HeinenDepartment of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Nicole KleinDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Nora A HerwegDepartment of Neuropsychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Christian J MerzDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Oliver T WolfDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 316803389Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 419039274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When recalling what you ate for breakfast last Wednesday, you might not remember the exact meal, but you may confidently select the items you typically eat. Here, semantic knowledge (i.e., what you usually eat) contributes to the reconstructive process of episodic memory retrieval (i.e., what you actually ate). In the current fMRI study, we used a highly realistic virtual environment to test this influence of semantic knowledge on episodic memory retrieval. During the task, 60 participants actively (task-relevant) or passively (task-irrelevant) encountered everyday objects that were either congruent (i.e., rubber duck in the bathroom) or incongruent (i.e., a toaster in the bathroom) with their expected location. Thereby, we created conflicting information between the episodic memory trace (toaster in the bathroom) and semantic information (toaster in the kitchen) during retrieval. Using multivariate analyses, we analyzed the neural basis of this semantic bias. Further, we administered cortisol, typically associated with impaired episodic memory retrieval, to half of the participants prior to retrieval, thereby manipulating the balance between correct episodic and incorrect semantic retrieval. In the lateral occipital cortex (LOC), incongruent task-relevant objects showed greater similarity to their congruent semantic counterparts than did task-irrelevant objects. Notably, spatial memory tended to be reflected in similarity patterns in the LOC. Strikingly, incongruent objects showed a higher pattern reorganization (i.e., pre-/post-encoding similarity) compared to congruent objects, reflecting a difference in neural representation for objects encountered in conflict with prior knowledge. In contrast to our hypotheses, cortisol prior to retrieval had no effect on semantic bias. However, cortisol influenced neural pattern similarity: we found higher pattern reorganization within the posterior hippocampus in the cortisol group. Similarly, we found higher confidence to be linked with similarity patterns in the LOC and lingual gyrus in the placebo, but not in the cortisol group. This indicates an effect of cortisol on memory trace reinstatement during retrieval. Our findings on incongruent object processing contribute to the understanding of how the human brain constructs past episodes from episodic memory traces, suggesting an influence of prior semantic knowledge, reflected in neural similarity patterns.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicMental RecallOccipital LobeSemanticsAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultHydrocortisonefalse memoryfMRImemory reconstructionrepresentational similarityVR

Identifiers

PMID41137744
PMCPMC12553115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.