Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137740›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

From Speech Semantics to Brain Activity-Timescales Are Key in Their Information Transfer.

Saket Kumar, Philipp Klar, Yasir Çatal, Han-Jen Chang, Friedemann Pulvermüller, Georg Northoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saket KumarBrain and Mind Research Institute, Centre for Neural Dynamics, Faculty of Medicine, The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research & University of Ottawa, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-9892-2747
Philipp KlarFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1702-8029
Yasir ÇatalBrain and Mind Research Institute, Centre for Neural Dynamics, Faculty of Medicine, The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research & University of Ottawa, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Han-Jen ChangBrain and Mind Research Institute, Centre for Neural Dynamics, Faculty of Medicine, The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research & University of Ottawa, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Friedemann PulvermüllerBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Georg NorthoffBrain and Mind Research Institute, Centre for Neural Dynamics, Faculty of Medicine, The Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research & University of Ottawa, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluctuating timescales are present in nature and are commonly observed in music, movies, brain activity, and speech. In human speech, semantic timescales span from single words to complete sentences and vary throughout conversation. Similarly, the brain's intrinsic neuronal timescales (INT), reflected in temporally correlated activity, carry information across time. How are these semantic and neuronal timescales related? Our combined semantic input and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study using the 7 Tesla Human Connectome Project movie-watching dataset reveals information transfer from speech's semantic timescales to the brain's INT. We extracted two semantic time-series, sentence similarity and word depth, using Sentence-BERT (SBERT) and WordNet, respectively. The timescales of both semantic signals and the brain's activity were quantified using the autocorrelation window (ACW), with a dynamic, time-varying analysis approach. This allows testing for information transfer from the simultaneously varying semantic timescales to the brain's varying timescales via Transfer Entropy (TE). We report three main findings: (1) Sentence similarity and word depth time-series exhibit high and systematic fluctuations over time. (2) Dynamic ACW analysis captures the dominant timescales in both semantic input (sentence similarity and word depth) and the brain's continuously varying INT. (3) Significant TE from the varying semantic timescales to the brain's simultaneously varying INT. We also demonstrate that the information transfer only emerges on the level of timescales, and is absent when comparing the two raw semantic input time-series with the BOLD signal, respectively. Conclusively, we demonstrate the key role of timescales in the information transfer from semantic inputs to the brain's neural activity.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeNerve NetSemanticsSpeech PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTime FactorsYoung Adultinformation transfersemanticsspeechtimescales

Identifiers

PMID41137740
PMCPMC12553116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.