ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
From Speech Semantics to Brain Activity-Timescales Are Key in Their Information Transfer.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Speech Semantics to Brain Activity-Timescales Are Key in Their Information Transfer.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluctuating timescales are present in nature and are commonly observed in music, movies, brain activity, and speech. In human speech, semantic timescales span from single words to complete sentences and vary throughout conversation. Similarly, the brain's intrinsic neuronal timescales (INT), reflected in temporally correlated activity, carry information across time. How are these semantic and neuronal timescales related? Our combined semantic input and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study using the 7 Tesla Human Connectome Project movie-watching dataset reveals information transfer from speech's semantic timescales to the brain's INT. We extracted two semantic time-series, sentence similarity and word depth, using Sentence-BERT (SBERT) and WordNet, respectively. The timescales of both semantic signals and the brain's activity were quantified using the autocorrelation window (ACW), with a dynamic, time-varying analysis approach. This allows testing for information transfer from the simultaneously varying semantic timescales to the brain's varying timescales via Transfer Entropy (TE). We report three main findings: (1) Sentence similarity and word depth time-series exhibit high and systematic fluctuations over time. (2) Dynamic ACW analysis captures the dominant timescales in both semantic input (sentence similarity and word depth) and the brain's continuously varying INT. (3) Significant TE from the varying semantic timescales to the brain's simultaneously varying INT. We also demonstrate that the information transfer only emerges on the level of timescales, and is absent when comparing the two raw semantic input time-series with the BOLD signal, respectively. Conclusively, we demonstrate the key role of timescales in the information transfer from semantic inputs to the brain's neural activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.