Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137700›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental toxicology2026

Cabomba caroliniana and Schoenoplectus californicus as Antifouling Candidates: Anti-Attachment and Toxicological Effects in Aurelia coerulea (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa).

Mikael Luiz Pereira Morales, Laís Olivera das Neves, Ayman Shaik, Hafizah Chenia, Maximiliano Manuel Maronna, Sanye Soroldoni, Renato Mitsuo Nagata, Ng Haig They, Vanessa Ochi Agostini, Grasiela Lopes Leães Pinho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mikael Luiz Pereira MoralesPrograma de Pós-graduação em Oceanologia, Instituto de Oceanografia (IO) da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4329-5465
Laís Olivera das NevesPrograma de Pós-graduação em Oceanologia, Instituto de Oceanografia (IO) da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4068-8661
Ayman ShaikMicrobiology, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8707-5755
Hafizah CheniaMicrobiology, School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9753-6394
Maximiliano Manuel MaronnaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Oceanografia Biológica, Instituto de Oceanografia (IO) da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2590-639X
Sanye SoroldoniPrograma de Pós-graduação em Oceanologia, Instituto de Oceanografia (IO) da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-9932
Renato Mitsuo NagataPrograma de Pós-graduação em Oceanografia Biológica, Instituto de Oceanografia (IO) da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4125-3958
Ng Haig TheyDepartamento Interdisciplinar, Campus Litoral Norte, Centro de Estudos Costeiros Limnológicos e Marinhos (CECLIMAR) da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Imbé, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4132-2703
Vanessa Ochi AgostiniRegenera Moléculas do Mar, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8325-254X
Grasiela Lopes Leães PinhoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Oceanologia, Instituto de Oceanografia (IO) da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG), Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7951-0334

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoMixed Technical Commission of Salto Grande and Latitud (Uruguayan Technological Laboratory Foundation - LATU)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofouling on artificial surfaces in aquatic ecosystems leads to significant economic losses. Current antifouling paints, while effective, often harm the aquatic environment. This study explores ecologically safe antifouling alternatives derived from plants, focusing on the aquatic macrophytes Cabomba caroliniana (CC) and Schoenoplectus californicus (SC). While these macrophytes have shown promise against microfouling, their effectiveness against marine macrofouling remains underexplored. For marine macrofouling tests, Aurelia polyps have been recommended due to their availability and handling. Using the marine cnidarian Aurelia coerulea (AC) as a model organism, the ability of CC and SC extracts to inhibit polyp attachment was evaluated as well as their toxicological effects on polyps and ephyrae. Additionally, the sensitivity of AC to substances (surfactant, zinc, and copper) was assessed to determine its sensitivity compared to other organisms. A dose-dependent inhibition of polyp attachment was observed, with up to 65% efficacy. Toxicity tests indicated low toxicity at concentrations of up to 5% for CC and 20% for SC. The main compounds identified were n-nonadecanol-1 for CC and eicosane for SC. Additionally, AC proved to be a versatile anti-attachment assay model, offering advantages such as sensitivity to chronic and acute tests, dual life stages, and short assay times of up to 72 h. These results suggest the biotechnological potential of CC and SC as natural antifouling agents and highlight their suitability for developing environmentally friendly antifouling applications.

Indexed as

BiofoulingPlant ExtractsScyphozoaAnimalsPlant Extractsantifoulingaquatic macrophytesattachmentAurelianatural productstoxicology

Identifiers

PMID41137700
PMCPMC13155321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.