ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Cortical Dynamics Underlying Perceived Visibility: An Event-Related Potential Investigation of Forward Masking.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cortical Dynamics Underlying Perceived Visibility: An Event-Related Potential Investigation of Forward Masking.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forward masking has been a fruitful approach for understanding the temporal organization of perception and the dynamics of visual processing. However, there is still limited knowledge on the neural correlates of forward masking and cortical processes underlying the modulations of perceived visibility under this masking type. Notably, the ERP components (event-related potentials) associated with this paradigm have not been identified yet. Therefore, we designed an ERP study combined with a forward-masking paradigm and recorded cortical activities while observers performed a contour discrimination task on the target. We manipulated stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) and mask-to-target (M/T) contrast ratio to have different masking conditions. In line with previous research, the perceived visibility of the target significantly depended on SOA, with a strong suppression elicited by the preceding mask at short SOAs. More importantly, the magnitude of this brief inhibition was significantly enhanced by the M/T contrast ratio. ERP analyses revealed nonlinear interactions in both early and late positive components. In particular, we identified nonlinear suppressions in early P1 and late positivity, and the magnitude of these suppressions became larger for the short SOA and high M/T contrast ratio. On the other hand, the nature of interactions in N1 was facilitatory and became dominant in the longer SOA. We discuss these findings in light of previous empirical and modeling studies suggesting a three-process explanation of forward masking. Our findings provide important insights into the ERP correlates of forward masking and highlight the diverse, multiprocess nature of contextual influences on perceptual dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.