ArticleJournal of dental education2026
Psychometric Evaluation of a Novel Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire in a Postgraduate Orthodontic Department.
Article in Journal of dental education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient satisfaction with orthodontic treatment outcomes: a cross-sectional study at Tabriz postgraduate orthodontic department.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveImproving orthodontic care and academic orthodontic education in a university-based postgraduate clinic requires identifying key challenges and enhancing service quality. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a patient satisfaction questionnaire in a postgraduate orthodontic department.
methodsA group of experts, consisting of four females and six males (with a mean age of 40.30 years and an average of 12.10 years of work experience), evaluated the validity and reliability of a novel orthodontic treatment satisfaction questionnaire. The validity of the initial version, which included 27 items, was assessed by 10 orthodontic faculty members. Following this evaluation, the questionnaire was revised, resulting in a second version that contained 10 items. This revised version was administered to 30 patients (20 females and 10 males) after they completed their treatment (T1). To assess reliability, the same 30 participants completed a follow-up questionnaire two weeks later (T2). Various measures were employed, including the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), corrected item-total correlation (CITC), Kappa coefficient, and Cronbach's alpha.
resultsThe questionnaire was revised on the basis of an expert panel's evaluation of its validity and readability. After 17 items with a content validity ratio (CVR) below 0.62 were removed and one question was revised, 10 items remained. These items yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.92 and an ICC of 0.93.
conclusionThis study developed a validated questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction in a university-based postgraduate orthodontic clinic, providing a reliable tool for service evaluation and improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.