Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137161›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2025

The application of design thinking in physical activity research: a protocol for a scoping review.

Elise Rivera, Vivian Romero, Samuel Cassar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elise RiveraAppleton Institute, Central Queensland University, 44 B26, Wayville, SA, 5034, Australia. e.rivera@cqu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0366-2387
Vivian RomeroMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 207 Bouverie Street, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Samuel CassarAppleton Institute, Central Queensland University, 44 B26, Wayville, SA, 5034, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the many health benefits, global levels of physical activity remain insufficient. Traditional approaches to promoting physical activity have shown limited success, indicating the need for innovative strategies. Human-centred design thinking (HCDT) is a creative problem-solving and solution generation approach that offers a novel method for developing tailored interventions by engaging communities and understanding their specific contexts. However, it is unclear to what extent HCDT is being applied in physical activity research. The purpose of this protocol is to specify how a scoping review will be conducted to identify, explore, and map the application of HCDT in physical activity research.

methodsThe scoping review protocol will follow Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework, encompassing five stages: identifying the research question; identifying relevant studies; selecting eligible studies; charting the data; and collating, summarising, and reporting the results. The scoping review will follow the reporting guidance in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses protocols (PRIMSA-P) and the PRIMSA-P checklist for reporting scoping reviews. The database literature search will be conducted using PubMed, SportDiscus, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, ProQuest, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria include: qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods studies or protocol papers; full-text availability; published after 2016 and in English; and studies with explicit use of HCDT. Two reviewers will screen titles, abstracts, and full texts for inclusion. Two reviewers will extract the data from included studies using a data extraction table. Findings from the studies will be aggregated to summarise recurring themes via a narrative report. DISCUSSION: It is unknown how HCDT is currently being applied in physical activity research, despite its proven potential to address complex health challenges and offer innovative solutions. This scoping review will provide an overview of the current utilisation of HCDT, such as which HCDT approaches and activities are applied most often and where HCDT is being used for physical activity (i.e. populations, geographies). The scoping review findings will inform researchers, practitioners, and policymakers about the current state of HCDT in physical activity research. SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION: This protocol has been registered within the Open Science Framework platform: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/F94PZ ).

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionResearch DesignThinkingHumansScoping Reviews as TopicActive livingDesign thinkingHuman-centred design thinkingPhysical activityUser-centred design

Identifiers

PMID41137161
PMCPMC12551223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.