Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137148›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Depression, anxiety, and coping mechanisms among Sudanese healthcare workers amid the 2023 Sudan conflict: a cross-sectional study.

Muhannad Bushra Masaad Ahmed, Ahmed Balla M Ahmed, Maad Ahmed Mahjoub Nasor, Sohaib Mohammed Mokhtar Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhannad Bushra Masaad AhmedFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gadarif, Gadarif, Sudan.
Ahmed Balla M AhmedFaculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Al-Qasr Street, PO Box: 102, Khartoum, 11111, Sudan. m.salahballa@gmail.com.
Maad Ahmed Mahjoub NasorFaculty of Medicine, University of Medical Sciences and Technology, Khartoum, Sudan.
Sohaib Mohammed Mokhtar AhmedFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gadarif, Gadarif, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmid the ongoing Sudanese war, healthcare workers have faced violence and intense work in highly stressful environments, impacting their mental health. The insufficient mental health support system has exacerbated these challenges, affecting both their well-being and the care provided to patients. This study aims to assess the symptoms and prevalence of depression and anxiety among Sudanese healthcare workers and evaluate the coping mechanisms they employ during the current conflict.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among Sudanese healthcare workers using convenience sampling. Depression symptoms were assessed using the standardized Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), while anxiety symptoms were measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale, in addition to collecting socio-demographic data. Coping mechanisms were assessed using a structured set of multiple-choice questions. The sample size was estimated using the Cochrane formula. Chi-square tests were applied to examine the associations between depression, anxiety, and socio-demographic factors, while multivariable regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of psychological outcomes. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered for all statistical tests.

resultsThe mean depression score was 8.8 (SD = 6.0), with 36.9% of participants reporting depression and 6.6% experiencing severe depression. The mean anxiety score was 10.3 (SD = 5.9), with 56.5% of participants exhibiting anxiety symptoms and 28.1% experiencing severe anxiety. Male participants reported lower PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores than females (Est. = − 1.3637, p = 0.011; Est. = − 1.59028, p = 0.003). Compared to physicians, pharmacists (Est. = 1.8141, p = 0.039), nurses (Est. = 3.3503, p = 0.002), medical laboratory staff (Est. = 3.5181, p = 0.006), and administrative staff (Est. = 3.5278, p = 0.029) had higher depressive scores. The most commonly used coping mechanism was talking to friends and family, practiced by 28.8% of participants, followed by engaging in spiritual or religious practices (15.5%).

conclusionThis study found that a large number of Sudanese healthcare workers experienced anxiety symptoms, with a notable proportion also suffering from depression. The most common coping mechanism reported was support from family and friends. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying factors contributing to this psychological distress and to develop effective strategies, including targeted interventions such as remote psychological first aid, peer-support programs, and confidential tele-counselling for high-risk groups like females, administrative staff, nurses, and medical laboratory staff.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAnxietyDepressionHealth PersonnelAdultCoping SkillsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSudanYoung AdultAnxietyCoping mechanismsDepressionGAD-7PHQ-9Sudanese healthcare workersSudan war

Identifiers

PMID41137148
PMCPMC12553167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.