ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
The nordic and baltic EMS data - quality indicators and benchmarking 2025.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ambulance patients with altered level of consciousness: a registry-based cohort study from the North Denmark Region in 2017-2021.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Nordic-Baltic EMS benchmarking-important progress but fragile data foundations.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- The nordic and baltic EMS data - quality indicators and benchmarking 2025.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2014 a prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) data co-operation began between the five Nordic countries, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Iceland. The Baltic State Estonia joined the group in 2020. The Nordic-Baltic EMS Network, that was formed to continue the project-based collaboration as a more permanent entity, has now published their 2025 report. This commentary aims to promote the report and its key results. MAIN BODY: The report describes the current population, healthcare organisation and EMS systems of each country. Similarities in the EMS systems was found between several of the countries, such as the use of electronic prehospital medical records, and variants of the Emergence Medical Coordination Centre decision support tool Norwegian Index for Emergency Medical Assistance. While many of the included countries have national quality indicators on EMS, a list of Nordic-Baltic EMS Quality and Benchmarking Indicators were defined. Availability of data for these quality indicators varied between each nation, yet it was possible to compare several. The quality indicators included timepoints on dispatch and response, bystander CPR and return of spontaneous circulation, incidents, missions, patients advised or referred over the phone, non-conveyed patients, hospitalised patients, and transport missions. There were discrepancies between the included countries, due to several issues. Data completeness, quality and interpretation is assessed as a major point. Others include legislation, access points for acute patients, such as general practitioners available out-of-hours, or other acute medical helplines. However, differences in general population and EMS patient population in terms of demography and disease pattern may also be present. These elements have not been analysed in depth in the current report and should be considered when interpreting and comparing the results. SHORT
conclusionDespite national differences, the Nordic-Baltic EMS Network report provide an overview of the EMS systems and quality indicators, enabling preliminary comparisons. The online report is intended to be updated on an annual basis when possible and has already led to the planning of a future indicators, project groups and research. Together this promotes international collaboration, and exchange of experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.