Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137147›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

The nordic and baltic EMS data - quality indicators and benchmarking 2025.

Tim A Lindskou, Viljami Lampilinna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Nordic-Baltic EMS benchmarking-important progress but fragile data foundations.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. The nordic and baltic EMS data - quality indicators and benchmarking 2025.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tim A LindskouCentre for Prehospital and Emergency Research at Danish Centre for Health Services Research, Aalborg University Hospital and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. tim.l@rn.dk.
Viljami LampilinnaFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2014 a prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) data co-operation began between the five Nordic countries, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Iceland. The Baltic State Estonia joined the group in 2020. The Nordic-Baltic EMS Network, that was formed to continue the project-based collaboration as a more permanent entity, has now published their 2025 report. This commentary aims to promote the report and its key results. MAIN BODY: The report describes the current population, healthcare organisation and EMS systems of each country. Similarities in the EMS systems was found between several of the countries, such as the use of electronic prehospital medical records, and variants of the Emergence Medical Coordination Centre decision support tool Norwegian Index for Emergency Medical Assistance. While many of the included countries have national quality indicators on EMS, a list of Nordic-Baltic EMS Quality and Benchmarking Indicators were defined. Availability of data for these quality indicators varied between each nation, yet it was possible to compare several. The quality indicators included timepoints on dispatch and response, bystander CPR and return of spontaneous circulation, incidents, missions, patients advised or referred over the phone, non-conveyed patients, hospitalised patients, and transport missions. There were discrepancies between the included countries, due to several issues. Data completeness, quality and interpretation is assessed as a major point. Others include legislation, access points for acute patients, such as general practitioners available out-of-hours, or other acute medical helplines. However, differences in general population and EMS patient population in terms of demography and disease pattern may also be present. These elements have not been analysed in depth in the current report and should be considered when interpreting and comparing the results. SHORT

conclusionDespite national differences, the Nordic-Baltic EMS Network report provide an overview of the EMS systems and quality indicators, enabling preliminary comparisons. The online report is intended to be updated on an annual basis when possible and has already led to the planning of a future indicators, project groups and research. Together this promotes international collaboration, and exchange of experiences.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingEmergency Medical ServicesQuality Indicators, Health CareBaltic StatesHumansScandinavian and Nordic CountriesAmbulancesBaltic statesEmergency medical servicesQuality indicatorsScandinavian and nordic countries

Identifiers

PMID41137147
PMCPMC12553145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.