Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137129›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2025

Severe claw lesions in pregnant sows reduce prolificacy and increase litter heterogeneity.

Henar Gonzalez-Ramiro, Adelina López-Jara, Josep M Cambra, Alejandro Gonzalez-Plaza, Manuela Garcia-Canovas, Marina Lopez-Arjona, Maria Botia, Maria A Gil, Cristina Cuello, Heriberto Rodriguez-Martinez and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Henar Gonzalez-RamiroDepartment of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia - Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, Campus de Ciencias de la Salud, Murcia, Spain.
Adelina López-JaraDepartment of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia - Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, Campus de Ciencias de la Salud, Murcia, Spain.
Josep M CambraDepartment of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia - Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, Campus de Ciencias de la Salud, Murcia, Spain.
Alejandro Gonzalez-PlazaDepartment of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia - Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, Campus de Ciencias de la Salud, Murcia, Spain.
Manuela Garcia-CanovasDepartment of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia - Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, Campus de Ciencias de la Salud, Murcia, Spain.
Marina Lopez-ArjonaInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (INTERLAB-UMU), Department of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Maria BotiaInterdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (INTERLAB-UMU), Department of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Maria A GilDepartment of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia - Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, Campus de Ciencias de la Salud, Murcia, Spain.
Cristina CuelloDepartment of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia - Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, Campus de Ciencias de la Salud, Murcia, Spain.
Heriberto Rodriguez-MartinezDepartment of Biomedical & Clinical Sciences (BKV), BKH/Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, SE-58185, Sweden.
Emilio A MartinezDepartment of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia - Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, Campus de Ciencias de la Salud, Murcia, Spain. emilio@um.es.
Inmaculada ParrillaDepartment of Medicine and Animal Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research, University of Murcia - Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia, Campus de Ciencias de la Salud, Murcia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClaw lesions (CLs) are highly prevalent in sow herds, affecting animal welfare and productivity. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of CLs in pregnant sows and their impact on litter performance. Additionally, we assessed hair cortisol, cortisone, and oxytocin levels to determine whether CLs cause any stress in sows. The study involved 693 hyper-prolific sows, initially assessed for CLs at farrowing. After weaning, they were housed in individual AI crates, where their hair was shaved. At 28 days post-insemination, pregnant sows were moved to group pens. One week before expected farrowing, sows (n = 507) were transferred to individual farrowing crates where newly grown hair samples were collected, and CLs reassessed. Claw lesion severity was scored from 0 to 3 (SS0: no lesions, SS1: mild, SS2: moderate, SS3: severe). Sows were then classified into 3 categories (CAT): CAT1 (SS0 + SS1), CAT (SS1 + SS2, not SS3), and CAT3 (SS1 + SS2 + SS3). The total number of CL per sow and the final sow score were calculated as the sum of CLs observed on the claws and the sum of all CL severity scores, respectively.

resultsOnly 4,1% of sows had no CLs, while 66.5% exhibited moderate to severe lesions (CAT2+CAT3). Sows from CAT3 had the highest CL number and final sow score (p < 0.05) and presented the worst values for total piglets born, piglets born alive, low-weight piglets born ( < 1 kg), proportion of low-weight piglets born per litter, and mean litter weight at birth. However, stress biomarker levels did not differ among categories and were not associated with litter performance.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that severe CLs impair litter performance and increase litter heterogenicity, particularly the incidence of low-weight piglets born. These effects do not appear to be directly linked to stress biomarker levels but may result from behavioral and physiological disruptions affecting animal well-being derived from the presence of severe CLs. Given the significant economic and welfare implications of severe CLs, further research is needed to elucidate their impact on reproduction and to develop effective protocols to better detect stress and pain in affected sows.

Indexed as

Claw lesionLitter heterogeneitySowsStress biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID41137129
PMCPMC12553223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.