Trial reportJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025
Food label granularity and working memory: effects on food choice in a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWhile prior research on front-of-package labels has focused on their design, the impact of their informational granularity-or level of detail-on consumer choice remains understudied. This study aimed to investigate how the informational granularity of food calorie labels, in conjunction with consumers' working-memory capacity, influences choice behavior.
methodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted (UK adults, N = 498) in which participants completed a cereal-shopping task after being assigned to one of three conditions: coarse label, detailed label, or no label. Working-memory capacity was evaluated via a three-level n-back test. The primary outcomes measured were the average number of calories per chosen product and the probability of selecting low-calorie options. Multilevel models were employed to test both main and interaction effects, with the Benjamini-Hochberg adjustment applied to control the false discovery rate.
resultsCompared with the control condition, food labels reduced mean calorie selection by 4.56%. Each one-unit increase in 3-back performance resulted in an additional 14 kcal reduction under coarse labels and 18 kcal under detailed labels. Individuals with high working memory capacity exhibited a preference for moderate-calorie products over the lowest-calorie products when detailed labels were displayed. The effects of capacity under coarse labels were less pronounced and primarily limited to avoiding the lowest-calorie option. These findings provide conceptual insights into information optimization and offer practical guidance for policymakers on designing effective FOP schemes by specifying when detail helps versus hinders consumer choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.