ArticleBMC psychology2025
Meat-eating justifications in Türkiye: cultural adaptation, validation, and correlates of the MEJ and 4Ns scales.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPeople often avoid and try to stay ignorant of the negative aspects of meat production and consumption. When asked, people justify their meat consumption by emphasizing the necessity of meat for health, its desirable taste, naturalness, and normality. Relevant measures were developed to measure how much individuals rely on meat-eating justifications. Thus, the current work aims to translate and adapt the 4Ns scale by Piazza et al. (Appetite 91:114-128, 2015) and the Meat-eating Justifications Scale (MEJ) by Rothgerber (Psychol Men Masc 14(4):363-375, 2013) to Turkish to enable theoretical and applied studies of meat-eating in Turkish.
methodsThe relevant measures are translated and adapted to Turkish by expanding the item pool. The data of the translated measures and other relevant variables is collected between May 22 and December 31, 2022 (N = 520). The sample is divided into two parts: the first subsample is used to conduct Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), and the other is used to conduct Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Finally, a correlation matrix is created with the finalized versions of the meat-eating justification measures and other variables of interest.
resultsEFA for the 4Ns revealed a four-factor solution aligning with the original theoretical framework. Since the original measure accepted a single-factor solution, the current work improved on the original by reworking the low-loading items and introducing culture-specific items. After decisions about certain items, CFA is conducted, which indicated good fit (χ
conclusionCross-cultural adaptation and validation of the meat-eating justification scales enable a better theoretical understanding of the psychology of meat-eating. This is demonstrated by replicating the strong associations between meat-eating, its justifications, social dominance orientation, speciesism, and masculinity in a different cultural context. This understanding is essential for prevention and intervention efforts to reduce meat consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.