ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
MSTN gene editing does not alter reproductive capacity but modifies gestational metabolism in Mongolian cattle.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical outcome of an SCNT-derivedFrontiers in genome editing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe extended sexual maturity and prolonged gestation period of cattle limit their economic viability and hinder the breeding of superior genotypes. Reproductive efficiency is a critical factor in evaluating the economic value of cattle. Myostatin (MSTN) is a negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth. When it mutates, it promotes muscle development, providing a new strategy for modern beef cattle breeding. Although previous studies on MSTN gene-edited animals mainly focused on the mechanism of muscle growth, studies evaluating their reproductive performance and pregnancy outcomes are still limited. This study compared MSTN gene-edited Mongolian cattle (MT) with wild-type Mongolian cattle (WT) and Luxi cattle to assess the effect of MSTN editing on reproductive efficiency. Key parameters include reproductive organ morphology, hormone levels, blood metabolic profiles, and metabolomic changes during different gestation stages.
resultsThe statistical analysis results of reproductive organs (n = 10) and reproductive data (n = 20) showed that, compared with the WT Mongolian cattle, the MT cattle did not differ significantly Studies have shown that blood metabolites in estrus rate, pregnancy rate, calf birth rate, as well as the size of the ovaries and uterus (P > 0.05). Moreover, the dystocia rate of MT Mongolian cattle is significantly lower than that of WT Mongolian cattle (5.1% vs. 10.5%). Compared to WT cattle, the calves of the MT Mongolian cattle were heavier (P = 2.56815E-08), and the reproductive performance of the Mongolian cattle was better than Luxi cattle, specifically manifested as higher pregnancy success rate (WT-M vs. WT-L, 92.4% vs. 85.9%, MT-M vs. MT-L, 90.5% vs. 83.1%) and lower dystocia rate. The results of untargeted LC-MS metabolomics indicated that at different pregnancy stages, the MT cattle showed enhanced glucose metabolism, reduced lipid synthesis, lower circulating essential amino acids, and reduced tryptophan synthesis (n = 6). The results of serum ELISA at different pregnancy periods showed that the levels of E2 decreased and the levels of P4 increased in MT cattle (n = 3). These changes showed a regular pattern throughout the pregnancy cycle.
conclusionThese findings demonstrated that the MSTN gene editing did not compromise the reproductive performance of cattle, supporting its potential application in beef cattle breeding program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.