Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137105›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Exploring synthetic controls in rare diseases with a proof of concept in spinal cord injury.

Louis P Lukas, Samuel Håkansson, Miklovana Tuci, Abel Torres-Espín, Rüdiger Rupp, Olga Taran, Norbert Weidner, Fred Geisler, Martin Schubert, Frank Röhrich and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Louis P Lukas *Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Samuel Håkansson *Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Miklovana TuciDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abel Torres-EspínSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Rüdiger RuppFaculty for Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Olga TaranDepartment of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Norbert WeidnerFaculty for Medicine, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Fred GeislerUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Martin SchubertSpinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Frank RöhrichSpinal Cord Injury Center, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle, Germany.
Yorck B KalkeSpinal Cord Injury Center Orthopaedic Department, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Rainer AbelSpinal Cord Injury Center, Bayreuth, Germany.
Doris MaierSpinal Cord Injury Center, Trauma Center Murnau, Murnau, Germany.
Harvinder S ChhabraDepartment of Spine and Rehabilitation, Sri Balaji Action Medical Institute, New Delhi, India.
Thomas LiebscherTreatment Centre for Spinal Cord Injuries, Trauma Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
EMSCI study group
John L K KramerInternational Collaboration On Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Marc BolligerSpinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Armin CurtSpinal Cord Injury Center, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Catherine R Jutzeler *Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. catherine.jutzeler@hest.ethz.ch.
Sarah C Brüningk *Department of Health Sciences and Technology (D-HEST), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. sarah.brueningk@unibe.ch.

Funding

Botnar Research Centre for Child Health, University of Basel PEP-2021-1008International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia P192Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PZ00P3_186101Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung TMSGI3_225913Wings for Life 2017_044Wings for Life 2024_301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessfully completing clinical trials for rare and heterogeneous disorders, like spinal cord injuries (SCI), remains challenging, thereby reducing the ability to test and translate promising preclinical findings. We propose synthetic controls, derived from data-driven predictions of recovery in patients undergoing standard treatments, to mitigate these challenges, in particular related to patient recruitment.

methodsBased on data from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) and the Sygen trial, we construct synthetic controls from personalized predictions of neurological recovery of sequences of segmental motor scores. A total of six architectures (linear, tree, and deep learning models) are compared. We demonstrate the applicability of synthetic controls through a simulation framework modeling the randomization process in a clinical trial and a case study that re-evaluates the recently completed Nogo Inhibition in SCI (NISCI) trial as a single-arm trial post hoc.

resultsThe primary dataset included 4196 patients from EMSCI and 587 patients from the Sygen trial for external validation. We identified a convolutional neural network as the best-performing architecture to predict segmental motor score sequences, achieving a median root mean squared error below the neurological level of injury of 0.55. Our trial simulations demonstrate that synthetic controls are a viable alternative to randomization, as the proposed solution reduces intercohort heterogeneity and leads to no significant differences with randomized controls in our case study reassessing a clinical trial.

conclusionsWe provide a comprehensive benchmark of data-driven prediction architectures for neurological recovery after SCI. Apart from offering individual patients a specific recovery prediction, these models constitute the basis for synthetic controls. Using real-world data from a completed trial in SCI, we show that synthetic controls could mitigate the challenges of small cohorts and patient recruitment in rare disorders, offering the opportunity to maximize the number of patients receiving an investigative treatment. GITHUB REPOSITORY: https://gitlab.ethz.ch/BMDSlab/publications/sci/sci-in-silico-trials .

Indexed as

Rare DiseasesSpinal Cord InjuriesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerProof of Concept StudyClinical trial designMachine learningRecovery prediction

Identifiers

PMID41137105
PMCPMC12551237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.