ReviewNeurological research and practice2025
Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome prediction of non-convulsive status epilepticus in unconscious patients in intensive care units.
Review in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic coma in non-convulsive status epilepticus is associated with increased complications and mortality: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes and unmet therapeutic needs in new-onset refractory status epilepticus: evidence from a retrospective cohort.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Disease spectrum of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in children: A study based on clinical subtype characteristics and prognostic stratification.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Article
- Reply to the letter to the editor regarding "diagnosis, treatment, and outcome prediction of non-convulsive status epilepticus in unconscious patients in intensive care units".Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor regarding "Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome prediction of non-convulsive status epilepticus in unconscious patients in intensive care units" by Willems et al.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Hospital resource use and costs in autoimmune encephalitis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Reliability of EEG in brain death diagnosis: an analysis of clinical and technical factors.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Early non-convulsive status epilepticus in a preterm infant with recurrent refractoryFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Epilepsy, seizures and hyperexcitability-a challenge in neurology.Neurological research and practice · 2025Article
- Anesthetics in status epilepticus: does one size fits it all?-A scoping review on titration goals, timing, and patient selection.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a common definitive or exclusion diagnosis in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) on neurological or interdisciplinary intensive care units (ICU). Special expertise is required to ensure reliable diagnosis, targeted therapy management, and individual prognostication, particularly as NCSE is identified based solely on clinical and electroencephalographic findings. MAIN BODY: This narrative state-of-the-art review compiles and critically discusses the existing literature on various aspects of NCSE. We focus on the reliable initial diagnosis and further monitoring of NCSE using the Salzburg criteria and the 2HELP2B score, therapy options beyond current guideline recommendations, and prognosis assessment using established scores and metrics, such as STESS, SACE, EMSE, and END-IT. With compact tables and clear illustrations, comprehensive insights are presented in a concise structure to provide clear guidance for daily practice.
conclusionNCSE is a common and complex disease entity observed in the ICU that requires dedicated and specialised diagnostics, therapy, monitoring, and outcome assessment. Evidence-based recommendations are now available for each of these critical processes to guide caregivers and relatives. However, the availability of continuous (cEEG), quantitative (qEEG) electroencephalography in the ICU and expertise in its interpretation are limiting factors in many clinical settings. This problem is becoming increasingly pronounced due to the reduced or complete lack of reimbursement for c/qEEG in the context of intensive care medicine in many countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.