Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137086›Full record

ReviewNeurological research and practice2025

Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome prediction of non-convulsive status epilepticus in unconscious patients in intensive care units.

Laurent Maximilian Willems, Isabelle Beuchat, Urs Fisch, Raoul Sutter, Christoph Kellinghaus, Adam Strzelczyk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laurent Maximilian WillemsEpilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, University Medicine Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. willems@med.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-1674
Isabelle BeuchatDepartment of Neurology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Urs FischDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Raoul SutterDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christoph KellinghausDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Adam StrzelczykEpilepsy Center Frankfurt Rhine-Main, University Medicine Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a common definitive or exclusion diagnosis in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) on neurological or interdisciplinary intensive care units (ICU). Special expertise is required to ensure reliable diagnosis, targeted therapy management, and individual prognostication, particularly as NCSE is identified based solely on clinical and electroencephalographic findings. MAIN BODY: This narrative state-of-the-art review compiles and critically discusses the existing literature on various aspects of NCSE. We focus on the reliable initial diagnosis and further monitoring of NCSE using the Salzburg criteria and the 2HELP2B score, therapy options beyond current guideline recommendations, and prognosis assessment using established scores and metrics, such as STESS, SACE, EMSE, and END-IT. With compact tables and clear illustrations, comprehensive insights are presented in a concise structure to provide clear guidance for daily practice.

conclusionNCSE is a common and complex disease entity observed in the ICU that requires dedicated and specialised diagnostics, therapy, monitoring, and outcome assessment. Evidence-based recommendations are now available for each of these critical processes to guide caregivers and relatives. However, the availability of continuous (cEEG), quantitative (qEEG) electroencephalography in the ICU and expertise in its interpretation are limiting factors in many clinical settings. This problem is becoming increasingly pronounced due to the reduced or complete lack of reimbursement for c/qEEG in the context of intensive care medicine in many countries.

Indexed as

ComaEEGEpilepsyIntensive careLoss of consciousnessSeizure

Identifiers

PMID41137086
PMCPMC12553241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.