Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41137054›Full record

ArticleAnnals of general psychiatry2025

Exploring physicians' emotional reactions to suicidal patients: the impact of physician- and patient-related issues.

Dimitrios Kiakos, Céline Bourquin-Sachse, Stéphane Richard-Devantoy, Friedrich Stiefel, Laurent Michaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of general psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dimitrios KiakosGeneral Psychiatry Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), 18, Place Chauderon, Lausanne, 1003, Switzerland. Dimitrios.Kiakos@chuv.ch.
Céline Bourquin-SachseLiaison Psychiatry Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Stéphane Richard-DevantoyMcGill Group for Suicide Studies, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Friedrich StiefelLiaison Psychiatry Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laurent MichaudLiaison Psychiatry Service, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe physician-patient relationship is essential in the care of suicidal patients, yet factors shaping this relationship remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to explore physicians' emotional reactions to suicidal patients and how both physician- and patient-related issues influence these responses.

methodsInterviews were conducted with six physicians from the Douglas Mental Health University Institute in Montreal. A thematic analysis was performed using Hayes' structural model of countertransference as the analytical framework.

resultsThree primary emotional reactions emerged: emotional connection/avoidance, confidence/doubts, and powerlessness attributed to own limitations/to the patient. Clinicians' core needs-the need to help, need for security, and need for efficacy-were found to be pivotal in shaping these emotional responses. Similarly, patient-related factors, notably life experiences, disease, suicidality, and attitudes significantly influenced these reactions. Patterns linking physicians' emotional responses to their underlying needs and patient-related factors were analyzed, leading to the development of a conceptual framework.

conclusionsThis framework offers implications for research, clinical supervision, and medical training, fostering deeper insight into the physician-patient relationship in the context of suicidality.

Indexed as

CountertransferencePhysician–patient relationshipSuicideSuicide riskTherapeutic alliance

Identifiers

PMID41137054
PMCPMC12553232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.