ArticleBMC nursing2025
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the nurses sexual harassment scale: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chinese Adaptation of the Nurses Time-Wasters Questionnaire: Reliability and Validity Testing.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSexual harassment experienced by nurses in the workplace is a serious occupational health hazard that undermines their physical and psychological well-being, reduces job satisfaction, and thereby increases the risk of turnover and burnout.
methodsBetween December 2024 and January 2025, a total of 500 nurses from five hospitals in China were recruited for the study. The Chinese version of the nurse sexual harassment scale underwent cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in accordance with the Beaton guidelines and the COSMIN checklist. The psychometric properties, including content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and measurement error.
resultsThe Chinese version of the nurse sexual harassment scale is composed of 14 items divided into two dimensions: latent sexual harassment and manifest sexual harassment. The scale demonstrated a scale-level content validity index of 0.972, with item-level content validity index values ranging from 0.8 to 1.00. Exploratory factor analysis identified two factors that accounted for 77.785% of the total variance, while confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a good fit for the two-factor model. The overall Cronbach's alpha of scale was 0.956, a test-retest reliability of 0.847, and the Cronbach's alpha of latent and manifest sexual harassment dimensions were 0.931 and 0.972, respectively. Furthermore, the smallest detectable change was 2.321, and the scale demonstrated satisfactory responsiveness.
conclusionsThe Chinese version of the nurse sexual harassment scale displays strong validity and reliability, making it an effective tool for assessing nurses' experiences of sexual harassment within the Chinese cultural context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.