ArticleBMC health services research2025
Assessing stakeholder perceptions and contextual factors in implementing post-discharge malaria chemoprevention in children with severe anaemia in Malawi.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere anaemia poses a significant threat to children under five in sub-Saharan Africa, serving as one of the leading causes of hospitalisation and mortality in Malawi. In endemic regions, malaria complicates recovery in children admitted with severe anaemia and increases relapse risk. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends post-discharge malaria chemoprevention (PDMC) in moderate to high malaria transmission areas to reduce post-discharge mortality and readmissions. Still, it offers limited guidance on its implementation. This formative research study aimed to assess stakeholders’ perceptions of the WHO recommendation on PDMC and considerations for its practical implementation in Malawi.
methodsThis exploratory qualitative study, conducted in May 2024, employed in-depth and key informant interviews across various stakeholder levels in Malawi. We purposively sampled 31 participants. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed using inductive coding in NVivo 14.
resultsStakeholders revealed a continued high burden of malaria and anaemia, with significant gaps in knowledge among Health Surveillance Assistants and follow-up care. Caregivers faced numerous barriers to timely healthcare access, including traditional beliefs, financial constraints, and logistical challenges. Four broad themes emerged from the data: (i) understanding the dual challenge of malaria and anaemia in Malawian children, (ii) barriers to timely healthcare access, (iii) stakeholder perspectives on strategies to improve caregiver adherence to the PDMC regimen, and (iv) PDMC implementation considerations.
conclusionsFindings underscore operational challenges such as logistical constraints, medication supply issues, and targeted health worker training. It emphasises the importance of community engagement, strengthening supply chains, and integrating PDMC into health systems. Effective implementation will require collaboration among government agencies, health organisations, and local communities to foster sustainable practices, improve caregiver support, and ensure equitable access. These insights advance implementation science by illustrating how interventions like PDMC can be adapted and scaled in low-resource, high-burden settings to reduce childhood malaria and anaemia-related morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.