ArticleBMC nursing2025
Barriers and facilitators to implementing staffing models in South African long-term care facilities: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSouth Africa has a staffing model with mandatory staffing standards for long-term care facilities for older persons. This article reports on the barriers and facilitators encountered during the implementation of the staffing model in long-term care facilities within resource-constrained contexts.
methodsA multiple-case study design was employed, comprising multi-methods for data collection, including interviews and a document review. This article concerns the findings from the interviews. Nineteen nurses and caregivers were purposefully sampled and interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Ethical and principles that were maintained included ethical board clearance, institutional permission, voluntary participation, beneficence, anonymity, and confidentiality. Trustworthiness was ensured through applying principles such as credibility, dependability, and confirmability. The data were analysed following a thematic analysis process and reported in narrative form. The findings are organised according to two themes: Human resource practices influence staff management, and A perceived indifference to and neglect of residents’ acuity.
findingsFacilitators in implementing the staffing model were high caregiver staffing levels and the availability of relief staff for caregivers. Barriers to implementing the staffing model included inadequate nurse staffing levels, the unavailability of relief staff for nurses, facilities’ neglect to provide in-service training, and an inadequate skill mix. The small number of nurses employed seemingly led to fewer nurses with higher educational levels and skills in the total staff mix and the overuse of caregivers.
conclusionsPolicies should inform facilities’ staffing decisions to ensure adequate baseline nursing staffing and include support systems for nurses and caregivers to promote staff well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.