ArticleBMC cancer2025
Characterizing immune profiles in hepatocellular carcinoma patients benefiting from pembrolizumab and lenvatinib using machine learning.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCombination immunotherapies, such as pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (PL), are commonly used in treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, it remains challenging to predict which patients will benefit from this therapy. This study aimed to address this issue by comparing immune cell profiles (ICPs) between uHCC patients with objective response (responders, R) and those with tumor progression (non-responders, NR) following PL therapy, and to identify the key contributors to ICPs.
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 51 uHCC patients between July 2019 and July 2023. Peripheral blood samples were collected prior to initiating PL therapy, and ICPs were analyzed according to tumor response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. A machine learning (ML) model was developed to differentiate R from NR using baseline ICP data.
results16 patients achieved objective tumor responses, while 11 experienced disease progression following PL therapy. Responders exhibited higher levels of total T cells, CD8 T cells, and PD-1
conclusionThis study recognized distinct ICPs between uHCC patients with and without tumor response to PL therapy and identified key contributing immune subpopulations. These findings provide a foundation for developing predictive tools for clinical outcomes before initiating combination immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.