ArticleBMC medicine2025
Improving the school food environment and dietary intake of Dutch primary school students through the provision of a healthy school lunch: results of a pre-posttest effectiveness study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to improve the school food environment and dietary intake of Dutch primary school students by providing a healthy school lunch. We investigated (1) how the school lunch affected dietary intake and students' preferences for the lunches and (2) whether compensation effects at home occurred.
methodsThe study was conducted in Dutch primary schools among children in grades 5-8 (aged 8-12 years) and their parents. The intervention consisted of a free healthy school lunch for 6 months at three schools. To answer question 1, a quasi-experimental pre-post study was used. Lunch intake was assessed via photos at baseline, 3 and 6 months into the intervention, and 6 months after the intervention (12-month follow-up). Preferences were measured using a self-reported questionnaire at 3 and 6 months. To answer question 2, a quasi-experimental pre-post design with a comparison group (three intervention and three matched comparison schools) was used. Compensation effects, i.e., changes in home intake of healthy or unhealthy foods as a result of the school lunch, were assessed through a short parent questionnaire at month 6. Differences in consumption of core food groups were analyzed using non-parametric tests; compensation effects with Pearson chi-square tests.
resultsA total of 312 children participated (55.4% female). At baseline, 7.2% of the children consumed vegetables during lunch, which increased significantly at 3 months to 56.1% and 50.6% at 6 months. The intake of whole-grain bread and water/milk also increased, while white bread and sugar-sweetened beverage intakes decreased. The lunch was well appreciated and did not lead to any substantial compensation effects at home. After the program ended, vegetable and whole-grain bread intake at school declined, while intake of white bread and sugary drinks increased to preintervention levels.
conclusionsProviding a healthy school lunch positively influenced children's dietary intake at school without triggering unhealthy compensation at home. Improvements were most notable for vegetable intake, which increased substantially during the intervention. However, the effects were not sustained after the program ended, highlighting the importance of long-term provision and structural integration of healthy school lunches to support lasting dietary changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.