Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136929›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Chlamydia and gonorrhea incidence and residential segregation: US spatiotemporal patterns (2013-2021).

M Naser Lessani, Arielle N'Diaye, Zhenlong Li, Xiaoming Li, Shan Qiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M Naser LessaniGeoinformation and Big Data Research Laboratory, Department of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA.
Arielle N'DiayeDepartment of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Zhenlong LiGeoinformation and Big Data Research Laboratory, Department of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA.
Xiaoming LiDepartment of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Shan QiaoDepartment of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA. Shanqiao@mailbox.sc.edu.

Funding

The impacts of HIV-related service interruptions during COVID-19 pandemic in South CarolinaR01AI174892 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI Shan Qiao · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI174892NIH HHS R01AI174892NIH HHS R56AI17489601A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveInvestigate the association between residential segregation and the incidence of chlamydia and gonorrhea from 2013 to 2021 at the county level in contiguous U.S. states.

methodsNational-level secondary US data from 2013 to 2021 from the Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention Sexually Transmitted Infection surveillance dataset, American Community Survey, and Racial Segregation Index were analyzed using the Generalized Estimating Equation, and spatial regression. Analysis was divided into two periods (2013-2019; 2020-2021) to account for COVID-19 disruptions. Residential segregation was measured by dissimilarity index categorized into reference (< 0.25), moderate (0.26-0.50), high (0.51-0.75), and extreme (> 0.75) levels. Primary outcome measures were chlamydia and gonorrhea incidence rates. Residential segregation was the key independent variable with other social determinants of health covariates. 3,211 counties within the contiguous United States were included within this study. Counties with missing data, and not within the contiguous United States were excluded.

resultsFor chlamydia, from 2013 to 2019, segregation coefficients (i.e.,13.77 and 15.84 for moderate and high segregation) indicated that greater residential segregation was associated with higher chlamydia incidence rates (P < 0.0001). From 2020 to 2021, these coefficients increased (from 13 to 15 to 28.25 and 34.16), suggesting growing segregation-driven disparities. Gonorrhea followed a similar trend, with the coefficients increasing from 0.47 to 0.55 (P < 0.001) to 1.53 and 1.62 (P < 0.05), respectively. Spatial variation in the association between segregation and chlamydia incidence remained consistent, with more pronounced associations in the Southeastern, Midwest, and Western regions. Spatial variation in the association between segregation and gonorrhea incidence were more pronounced in the South and parts of the Midwest, with weaker associations in some Northern and Western regions.

conclusionsResidential segregation remained associated with chlamydia and gonorrhea transmission. The spatial patterns varied over time for both diseases. Further research should extend post-COVID-19 analysis to assess evolving relationships between residential segregation and STI incidence across U.S. regions. KEY POINTS: What is already known on this topic: Chlamydia and gonorrhea in 2023 were the most reported sexually transmitted infections in the United States, disproportionately affecting Black Americans. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study found that residential segregation was associated with race-specific differences in chlamydia and gonorrhea transmission, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.How this study might affect research, practice or policy: Study findings suggest that interventions aiming to reduce chlamydia and gonorrhea incidence rates in the United States should also include intervention activities that address adversities associated with residential segregation.

Indexed as

Chlamydia InfectionsGonorrheaResidence CharacteristicsSocial SegregationCOVID-19FemaleHumansIncidenceMaleResidential SegregationSpatio-Temporal AnalysisUnited StatesChlamydiaGonorrheaInfection ratesResidential segregationSexually transmitted infectionsSpaciotemporal analysis

Identifiers

PMID41136929
PMCPMC12551170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.