ArticleBMC public health2025
Indigenous youth mental health: an ecological approach to understanding risk and protective factors for Māori youth in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMāori (Indigenous) youth of Aotearoa New Zealand are experiencing widening inequities in mental health when compared to Pākehā (New Zealand European/other European/"White"; cultural majority) youth. This study used an ecological approach to investigate key risk and protective factors for Māori to help prioritise actions.
methodsA subsample of Māori participants (N = 1,528) from a large representative cross-sectional secondary dataset on secondary school students' health and wellbeing (Youth'19) were used to examine the effects of explanatory variables selected from five domains (individual, and their wider social ecosystem, including whānau/family, school, and community) on four mental health outcomes (wellbeing, depressive symptoms, suicide thoughts, suicide attempts). Descriptive statistics (percentages and 95% CIs) were used to examine the equity of these variables between Māori and Pākehā/White youth.
resultsOverall, individual risk factors included female sex, functional disability, and sexual abuse. Wider adverse social ecosystems included housing precarity, household deprivation, bullying, and racial discrimination. Key protective factors included the Indigenous concept of whanaungatanga (relationships/connection) with whānau (family), and feelings of safety in social ecosystems including home, school, and neighbourhoods. These risk and protective factors were broadly similar across the four mental health outcomes. Compared to Pākehā/White youth, Māori youth were exposed to greater risk-conferring ecosystems, including socioeconomic deprivation, discrimination, and violence-related harms.
conclusionsAddressing inequitable mental health harm requires not only intervening at the individual level, but also addressing the wider social ecosystems that disproportionately harm Māori youth, including colonial systems that consistently impact Indigenous youth mental health, particularly housing precarity, poverty, violence, bullying, and racism. Culturally and developmentally appropriate approaches with a focus on creating safe and inclusive societies are urgently required to reduce Indigenous youth mental health inequity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.