ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
Linking deliveries to newborns using nationwide Medicaid data.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLinking mothers to their newborns in health records is crucial for understanding the impact of policies, programs, and medical treatments on intergenerational health outcomes. While previous studies have used shared identifiers for linkage, such data are often unavailable in Medicaid records due to privacy concerns. Existing algorithms are not sufficiently flexible to accommodate Medicaid data from all states and from both Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) and Transformed Analytical Files (TAF) data systems.
methodsWe present a scalable framework and linking algorithm that connects deliveries and infants without relying on names, addresses, or linkage to vital records. First, we confirm our ability to identify newborn beneficiaries and deliveries resulting in live birth across states and over time by comparing our findings to the total number of Medicaid births recorded in the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS). Second, we confirm that our algorithm accommodates variations in Medicaid records over time and across states for MAX and TAF data, supporting matches at different levels of stringency. Finally, we assess the extent to which our algorithm is effective across demographic groups.
resultsUsing data from all 50 states over 9 years, our algorithm linked 11.68 million mother-infant dyads, covering 68% of Medicaid-enrolled infants, over 30% of all U.S. infants. Our linked cohort is approximately representative of the broader population of Medicaid beneficiaries on key observable characteristics including race and ethnicity, age, gender, and region. However, linked beneficiaries are more likely to be white and from the Midwest or Northeast relative to those we are unable to link.
conclusionsDespite substantial variation in the nature of Medicaid data across states and over time, it is possible to identify family units in all states between 2011 and 2019 without linking claims to vital records. This algorithm will facilitate research on social determinants of health and the intergenerational effects of medical interventions and public policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.