ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Identifying cortical and subcortical contributions to anticipatory postural adjustments preceding arm reaching movements in standing humans.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) are generally understood to be cortically driven, however there is some evidence to suggest subcortical regulation and contribution. We tested the hypothesis that subcortical pathways, if contributing, would be evidenced in increased late portions of the motor evoked potential (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation during different time intervals before and during the APA. Recordings from both the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles showed little evidence for this throughout the course of the APA, pointing instead to a generally cortical source for the APA. Despite this, the brainstem did not appear inactive, with MEPs elicited during voluntary contraction of the soleus being significantly smaller than those elicited prior to executing an APA- specifically during the later portion of the MEP, thought reflective of subcortical contribution. Further work to isolate specific brainstem upregulation and contribution is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41136855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.