ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Extreme nailing: standardized definition and outcomes.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to reliably define the concept of "extreme tibial nailing" and (2) assess the feasibility of tibial intramedullary nailing when the fracture extends into the nail's locking bolt zone.
methodsDesign: A retrospective review.
settingA single academic center comprised of a specialty orthopedic hospital and a Level I Trauma Center. Patient Selection Criteria: 543 patients who sustained 555 tibia fractures between February 2014 and January 2024 were reviewed by two board-certified orthopedic surgeons. Cases were classified as "extreme nailing" based on the tibial fracture within the most proximal or distal 25% of the bone such that the fracture extended into the locking bolt section of the intramedullary nail used to treat the fracture. Patients with supplemental periarticular plating of the tibia were excluded. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Data collected included patient demographics, hospital metrics, and outcomes.
resultsTwenty-five tibial fractures treated met radiographic criterion. The "extreme IMN" cohort was 45.8 years, 72% female with a mean BMI of 26.6. Over half of fractures resulted from high-energy injuries, and 40% were open. Patients were hospitalized for 92.8 h on average, and the 90-day readmission rate was 8.0%. The average time to weight-bearing allowance was 5.2 weeks post-op. Eight (32.0%) patients experienced complications: 12% developed fracture-related infection (FRI), 4% experienced hardware complications, and 20.0% developed nonunion requiring surgery. The rate of all-cause reoperation was 32.0%, and 28% of patients experienced knee or ankle pain at 6 months or later. The rate of malalignment was 8.0%, and the average time to radiographic healing was 5.7 months.
conclusionTibial nailing is an effective treatment for "extreme" tibial fractures that extend as far as the articular surface and interlocking cluster on either end. The majority of patients who underwent extreme tibial nailing recovered with acceptable alignment, minimal healing complications, and achieved radiographic union within 6 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41136762What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.