ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Evaluating human-in-the-loop strategies for artificial intelligence-enabled translation of patient discharge instructions: a multidisciplinary analysis.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an Equity-Centered Sociotechnical Architecture for Generative AI Integration in Public Health Promotion: Conceptual Framework.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Google Translate Voice App vs. Qualified Interpreters: An Exploratory Study of Clinical Accuracy in Real-World Speech/Voice Encounters.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bridging the Gap: Translated Medical Education to Support Cystic Fibrosis Centers From Non-English Speaking Countries.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Article
- Disparate language and model effects on AI-based translation and recognition of genetic conditions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Cultivating AI leaders: the role of clinical informatics fellowship in transforming healthcare.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
- Generative AI in simulation debriefings: an exploratory study using the Team-FIRST framework and qualitative feedback from simulation experts and learners.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- AI-enabled language technologies for language-mediated learning and clinical communication in international undergraduate dental education: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Exploring evaluation measures of large language models for family caregiver use: A scoping review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine translation supported by artificial intelligence (AI) may enhance linguistically-concordant care for patients speaking languages other than English. This assessment of free-text inpatient discharge instructions in Arabic, Armenian, Bengali, simplified Chinese, Somali, and Spanish compared linguist, clinician, and family caregiver evaluations of translations generated by (1) ChatGPT-4o, (2) professional linguists, and (3) human-in-the-loop (AI-generated, professional linguist post-edited). Likert scales (1-5; higher is better) evaluated linguistic and clinical characteristics of each translation. ChatGPT-4o exhibited variable performance relative to professional translations, with poorest ratings for digitally underrepresented languages (Armenian and Somali). Conversely, human-in-the-loop translations achieved comparable, often better, outcomes to professional translations for all languages, (e.g., Armenian mean overall quality: 3.9 [95% CI 3.7-4.2] vs. professional 3.6 [3.4-3.9], p = 0.01), were most frequently preferred (46.5% vs. 28.4%) and had shorter mean translation time (7.1 [5.4-8.8] vs. 16.8 [13.7-19.9] min, p < 0.001). Human-in-the-loop strategies may enable safe, efficient, equitable machine translation application in clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.