Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136707›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2026

Sex differences in giant panda paw preferences during bamboo feeding.

Rebecca J Snyder, Lisa P Barrett, Rong Hou, Jingchao Lan, Benjamin D Charlton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca J SnyderMammal Department, Zoo Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA. rsnyder@okczoo.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6608-3601
Lisa P BarrettCenter for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6072-3479
Rong HouChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology for Endangered Wildlife, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jingchao LanChengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Sichuan Key Laboratory of Conservation Biology for Endangered Wildlife, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Benjamin D CharltonInstitute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0218-7177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined giant panda paw use while feeding on bamboo to determine if this species exhibits manual lateralization. Video recordings of 21 captive giant pandas (15 females and six males) were used to measure two unimanual behaviors: 1) duration of grasping and manipulating bamboo culm during feeding bouts and 2) number of reaches. We did not find paw preferences at the population level but found significant sex differences in paw use. Male giant pandas used their right paw significantly more than their left paw while manipulating bamboo culm, whereas females used their left paw more for both manipulating and reaching for bamboo. Our results differ from previous studies, in which males of most placental quadrupeds have been found to favor the left forelimb more so than females. This preliminary study also suggests that task differences influence the degree of manual lateralization in the giant panda, and challenges the hypothesis that a lack of a corpus callosum leads to sex differences in marsupial forelimb biases. Considering the giant panda's distinctive behavioral ecology, morphology, and evolutionary history, this species provides a valuable model for investigating manual lateralization. We recommend further research on giant pandas, to test our preliminary findings, as well as comparative studies across other ursid species, which exhibit substantial variation in habitat and feeding ecology.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorForelimbFunctional LateralitySex CharacteristicsUrsidaeAnimalsFemaleMaleAiluropodaBearForelimb preferenceHandednessLateralizationMelanoleuca

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.