Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136697›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Response to the Comments on "The Chestnut Technique: A Novel Approach to Enhancing Implant Stability in Breast Augmentation".

Mert Demirel, Mert Ersan

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mert Demirel, Kadikoy, Turkey.
Mert ErsanPlastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Department, Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine, Yeditepe University Kozyatagi Hospital, Icerenkoy Mahallesi, Hastahane Sokak , 34752, Atasehir, Istanbul, Turkey. mert.ersan@yeditepe.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0001-6109-8919

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This response addresses the comments by Arif et al. on our article, "The Chestnut Technique: A Novel Approach to Enhancing Implant Stability in Breast Augmentation." We acknowledge the limitations raised regarding patient demographics, follow-up duration, and comorbidities and agree that larger and more diverse cohorts are needed to strengthen the evidence. We also emphasize the importance of objective assessments, noting our ongoing prospective study incorporating MRI at 12 months to evaluate inferior flap viability. Additionally, we highlight the need to assess functional outcomes such as lactation and breast sensation in future research. We appreciate these constructive remarks, which underscore the importance of extended follow-up and collaborative investigations to validate and refine the Chestnut Technique as a reliable method for enhancing implant stability.No Level Assigned This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast ImplantationBreast ImplantsMammaplastyFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeBreast augmentationBreast implant complicationsBreast implant technologyInframammary foldInframammary muscle slingSubmuscular plane

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.