Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Clinical Efficacy of High-Frequency Ultrasound Precision Monitoring Ring Drilling in the Treatment of Pathologic Scarring.
Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this study is to explore the clinical efficacy of high-frequency ultrasound precision monitoring ring drilling for the treatment of pathologic scarring.
methodsA total of 124 patients with pathologic scarring treated in Wenzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine from January 2020 to July 2024 were selected for the study and were randomly divided into the control group and the treatment group, with 62 patients in each group.
resultsThe total effective rate was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, scores for pigmentation, vascularity, thickness, pliability, and the total Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Similarly, visual analog scale (VAS) scores and itch scores were significantly lower in the treatment group compared to the control group (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions-including hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation, redness, swelling, and pain-between the two groups (P > 0.05).
conclusionHigh-frequency ultrasound precision monitoring ring drilling is a fast, safe, and convenient operation technique, has a promoting effect on the regression of scarring, and is worth promoting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41136695What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.