ArticleScientific reports2025
Artificial intelligence strategies based on random forests for detecting ischemia-reperfusion injury changes in kidney tissue during intravital imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a supervised machine learning approach using a Random Forest classifier to detect ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) in kidney tissue based on intravital two-photon microscopy data. A rodent model of unilateral renal IRI was used, with 30 min of pedicle occlusion followed by 15 min of reperfusion. Continuous imaging captured nuclear (Hoechst 33342), vascular (FITC-dextran), and mitochondrial (TMRM) changes in real time. From extracted video frames, 2000 manually segmented regions of interest (ROIs), 1000 control and 1000 injured segments, were analyzed using texture analysis. Five textural features were used as input: angular second moment (ASM) and inverse difference moment (IDM) from gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM); short run emphasis (SRE) and long run emphasis (LRE) from run length matrix (RLM); and HH wavelet coefficient energy (EnHH) from discrete wavelet transform (DWT). All showed significant differences (p < 0.001) between injured and control tissue. The Random Forest model achieved 79.8% accuracy, a macro F1-score of 0.79, a Matthews Correlation Coefficient of 0.5959, and an ROC AUC of 0.83. These findings highlight the potential of AI-based texture analysis to detect early nuclear and vascular alterations during IRI. Future work should expand datasets, include 3D analyses, and incorporate multimodal imaging for greater generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.