ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of advanced chronic kidney disease through retinal fundus images by deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From fundus to filtration: AI-driven retinal phenotyping as a framework for non-invasive prediction of kidney pathological categories (the "virtual renal biopsy" concept)- a narrative review.International urology and nephrology · 2026Review
- Relationship between hemoglobin levels and diabetic retinopathy in Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus populations: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease: Bibliometric and visual analysis of trends and future directions.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was developed and evaluated deep learning model for detecting chronic kidney disease (CKD) by retinal fundus images. This study included 42,963 clinical visits from 17,442 patients who underwent retinal fundus examination between October 19, 2006, and September 13, 2018, with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements available within a 7-day interval of the imaging examination. We developed and compared three model configurations: using a single fundus image (Model A), combining a single image with demographic features (Model B), and integrating bilateral fundus images (Model C). We compared two base architectures, EfficientNet-B3 and EfficientNetV2-S, and evaluated the impact of different training strategies: a single model versus a 5-fold cross-validation (CV) ensemble. Model performance was assessed using the Area Under the Curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV). Among all evaluated models, the bilateral-image model (Model C) utilizing the EfficientNet-B3 architecture with a 5-fold CV ensemble strategy demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving an AUC of 0.868, with a sensitivity of 0.792 and a specificity of 0.788 on an independent test set. The performance of this ensemble strategy was statistically superior to its single-model counterpart trained on the full dataset (AUC 0.850, p < 0.001). Among single models, Model B yielded the highest AUC (0.857) and sensitivity (0.794), while Model C offered the highest specificity (0.799), revealing a clinical trade-off between the different approaches. Furthermore, benchmarking against the newer EfficientNetV2-S architecture did not yield a performance benefit in this study. The study exhibited a superior performance in detecting advanced chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes mellitus through retinal fundus image.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.