Observational studyScientific reports2025
Psychometric properties of the SMART tool for infant oral feeding skill assessment.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Premature and medically complex infants are at risk of feeding problems, specifically the delay in the development of independent oral feedings, which leads to prolonged hospital stays, higher costs, malnutrition, developmental delays, and family stress. Available oral feeding skill assessment tools lack strong psychometrics, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness. We developed a novel tool, the SMART tool, to address these barriers. The objective of this study was to establish the psychometric properties of the SMART tool for assessing infant oral feeding skills. The study design was a prospective, observational, multicenter trial. To establish criterion validity, we hypothesized that the performance of the SMART tool would be similar to that of a comparator tool, the Neonatal Eating Outcome Assessment (NEOA) tool. A convenience sample of 76 infants across four level-3 Neonatal Intensive Care Units were enrolled, and 136 complete feeding observations were included. Compared to NEOA, the SMART tool had a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI 0.63-0.89) and a specificity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.93), with a strong correlation (r = 0.7, p < 0.001). Inter-rater reliability of post-feed scores was 100% agreement. The SMART tool is valid, reliable, and feasible for assessing infant oral feeding skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.