ReviewHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Development of tenecteplase for stroke thrombolysis: Japan's endeavor.
Review in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standard-Dose Tenecteplase vs Low-Dose Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke From Large-Vessel Occlusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA neurology · 2026Trial
- Risk factors for hemorrhagic transformation after tenecteplase therapy in acute ischemic stroke: A retrospective observational study.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus urokinase in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.Medicine · 2026Observational
- Micro/Nanorobotic Systems for Imaging-Guided Closed-Loop Thrombus Recanalization.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke is strongly recommended based on high-level evidence. However, the efficacy of the currently approved drug, alteplase, is not necessarily sufficient. Thrombolysis can trigger intracranial hemorrhage, that is a critical issue that cannot be overlooked, especially for Asians, who are generally hypertensive and prone to bleeding, making strict blood pressure control essential. Based on clinical trial results of a new thrombolytic agent, tenecteplase, several guidelines now recommend its use, and the off-label use has become common in many countries. As of 2024, regulatory approval has been granted in Western countries. Approval is also expected in major Asian countries between 2025 and 2026. In Japan, approval requires clinical data specific to Japanese patients, but no domestic pharmaceutical company currently handles the drug. We are conducting an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, masked-endpoint, superiority trial, T-FLAVOR, comparing tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg (international standard dose) with alteplase at 0.6 mg/kg (a unique low dose approved in Japan). The target population consists of patients with ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion within 4.5 h of onset, who are also eligible for mechanical thrombectomy within 6 h. The primary efficacy outcome is successful early reperfusion assessed via catheter angiography after drug administration. Enrollment of the planned 220 participants was complete, and results are expected to be published in 2025. This is the only clinical trial using tenecteplase in Japan and the world's first to directly compare tenecteplase and low-dose alteplase (0.6 mg/kg).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.