Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136596›Full record

ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026

Alerting reaction of blood pressure and risk of mortality in an elderly Chinese population.

Chang-Sheng Sheng, Qi-Fang Huang, Yan Li, Ji-Guang Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Response to: Reconsidering the clinical significance of the alerting reaction of blood pressure in elderly individuals.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  2. Reconsidering the clinical significance of the alerting reaction of blood pressure in elderly individuals.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chang-Sheng ShengDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials. The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qi-Fang HuangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials. The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yan LiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials. The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ji-Guang WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Centre for Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials. The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. jiguangwang@rjh.com.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension guidelines recommend multiple blood pressure measurements to minimize the potential initial alerting reactions. This study investigated the prognostic significance of this reaction in elderly individuals. The study subjects (aged ≥60 years) were recruited from the suburban Shanghai. Blood pressure was measured three times consecutively with a 60 s interval in the sitting position using an oscillometric device. An alerting reaction was defined as that the first blood pressure reading exceeded the average of the subsequent two readings. In the total of 4512 participants (44.7% men, average age 66.8 years), those with an alerting reaction (n = 2633) were younger than those without (n = 1879; 65.8 vs. 68.0 years, P < 0.0001). During 5.9 years median follow-up (24,576 person-years), 430 and 221 total and cardiovascular deaths occurred, respectively. Adjusted Cox regression analyses showed that individuals with an alerting reaction had an 18% lower risk of total mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99; P = 0.04) and 36% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P = 0.002) than those without alerting reaction. Further categorical analyses on the greater differences showed that the hazard ratio for an alerting reaction of >5 mmHg (n = 1448) versus ≤-5 mmHg (n = 832) was 0.75 (95% CI,0.57-0.99; P = 0.04) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.38-0.85; P = 0.006) for total and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. In conclusion, this study first identified that the alerting reaction of blood pressure was associated with a notably lower mortality risk in an elderly population. The underlying mechanism should be investigated in future studies.

Indexed as

Blood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Pressure DeterminationChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsAlerting reactionBlood pressure measurementElderlyMortality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.