ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Alerting reaction of blood pressure and risk of mortality in an elderly Chinese population.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to: Reconsidering the clinical significance of the alerting reaction of blood pressure in elderly individuals.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Reconsidering the clinical significance of the alerting reaction of blood pressure in elderly individuals.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertension guidelines recommend multiple blood pressure measurements to minimize the potential initial alerting reactions. This study investigated the prognostic significance of this reaction in elderly individuals. The study subjects (aged ≥60 years) were recruited from the suburban Shanghai. Blood pressure was measured three times consecutively with a 60 s interval in the sitting position using an oscillometric device. An alerting reaction was defined as that the first blood pressure reading exceeded the average of the subsequent two readings. In the total of 4512 participants (44.7% men, average age 66.8 years), those with an alerting reaction (n = 2633) were younger than those without (n = 1879; 65.8 vs. 68.0 years, P < 0.0001). During 5.9 years median follow-up (24,576 person-years), 430 and 221 total and cardiovascular deaths occurred, respectively. Adjusted Cox regression analyses showed that individuals with an alerting reaction had an 18% lower risk of total mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99; P = 0.04) and 36% lower risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P = 0.002) than those without alerting reaction. Further categorical analyses on the greater differences showed that the hazard ratio for an alerting reaction of >5 mmHg (n = 1448) versus ≤-5 mmHg (n = 832) was 0.75 (95% CI,0.57-0.99; P = 0.04) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.38-0.85; P = 0.006) for total and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. In conclusion, this study first identified that the alerting reaction of blood pressure was associated with a notably lower mortality risk in an elderly population. The underlying mechanism should be investigated in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41136596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.