SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
Surgical extent in chronic rhinosinusitis stratified by the LOEM system: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing Surgical Extent in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Scoping Review of Scoring Systems.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEndoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is widely used for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), but the optimal surgical extent remains unclear. The Lamella Ostium Extent Mucosa (LOEM) system provides a standardized framework to stratify surgical procedures and improve comparability. This study aimed to compare outcomes of limited versus extensive ESS and to explore results according to LOEM categories.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through April 2025. Eligible studies included adults with CRS undergoing ESS comparing limited and extensive surgical approaches. Outcomes included quality of life (SNOT-22), symptom severity (VAS), recurrence, and revision surgery. Procedures were reclassified according to the LOEM system by consensus.
resultsThirteen studies involving 2,024 patients were included. Extended procedures (LOEM 2-4) were associated with fewer revisions, lower recurrence rates, and greater SNOT-22 improvement compared with limited surgery (LOEM 1). The most extensive approach (LOEM 4) showed the highest symptom improvement.
conclusionMore extensive ESS was associated with superior outcomes in CRS, including lower revision and recurrence rates and greater symptom relief. While the primary objective was to compare limited and extensive approaches, retrospective application of the LOEM classification provided a structured framework that not only confirmed these trends but also enabled more granular comparisons across surgical subtypes, from conservative functional surgery (LOEM 1-2) to radical and regenerative techniques (LOEM 3-4).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41136575What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.