Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136550›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Oculomotor chronometry of spoken word structure processing.

Oren Kadosh, Benjamin Menashe, Yael Gera, Michal Ben-Shachar, Yoram S Bonneh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Oren KadoshSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Benjamin MenasheThe Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Yael GeraDepartment of English Literature and Linguistics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Michal Ben-ShacharThe Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Yoram S BonnehSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel. Yoram.Bonneh@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oculomotor inhibition (OMI) is the momentary inhibition of involuntary eye movements, such as saccades and blinks, following sensory stimulation. Higher-level cognitive processes, such as processing the structure of written words, have been shown to affect the duration and magnitude of the OMI. In this study we tested whether OMI measures are influenced by the processing of spoken word structures. Participants listened to Hebrew words and pseudowords presented auditorily while we recorded their microsaccades, eye blinks, and pupil dilation. Spoken pseudowords were divided into two groups based on their underlying linguistic structure, with one half containing real roots and the other half containing invented roots. Results show a greater OMI for Real-root pseudowords as compared to Invented-root pseudowords, replicating the morpheme interference effect found previously for written stimuli. OMI measures, including microsaccade and eye blink latencies, as well as pupil dilation peak latency, were consistently greater for real-root pseudowords compared to invented-root pseudowords. These findings demonstrate the sensitivity of OMI to the cognitive processing of spoken word structure, even in the absence of visual stimuli or visually directed task. The results highlight the potential role of oculomotor responses as a marker of higher-order linguistic processing.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsSaccadesSpeech PerceptionAdultBlinkingFemaleHumansMalePupilReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41136550
PMCPMC12552745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.