ArticleScientific reports2025
Oculomotor chronometry of spoken word structure processing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceptual punctuation: fixational eye movements reveal segmentation of auditory streams.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oculomotor inhibition (OMI) is the momentary inhibition of involuntary eye movements, such as saccades and blinks, following sensory stimulation. Higher-level cognitive processes, such as processing the structure of written words, have been shown to affect the duration and magnitude of the OMI. In this study we tested whether OMI measures are influenced by the processing of spoken word structures. Participants listened to Hebrew words and pseudowords presented auditorily while we recorded their microsaccades, eye blinks, and pupil dilation. Spoken pseudowords were divided into two groups based on their underlying linguistic structure, with one half containing real roots and the other half containing invented roots. Results show a greater OMI for Real-root pseudowords as compared to Invented-root pseudowords, replicating the morpheme interference effect found previously for written stimuli. OMI measures, including microsaccade and eye blink latencies, as well as pupil dilation peak latency, were consistently greater for real-root pseudowords compared to invented-root pseudowords. These findings demonstrate the sensitivity of OMI to the cognitive processing of spoken word structure, even in the absence of visual stimuli or visually directed task. The results highlight the potential role of oculomotor responses as a marker of higher-order linguistic processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.