Trial reportScientific reports2025
Effect of intrapulpal cryoanesthesia on intraoperative pain during root canal treatment in mandibular molars: a double blinded randomized control trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pain Management in Mandibular Molars With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: Mechanisms, Clinical Efficacy and Current Evidence: A Narrative Review.Pain research & management · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the impact of cooling the anesthetic solution prior to administering intra-pulpal anesthesia on the severity of intraoperative pain during root canal treatment in mandibular molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis. Forty patients with mandibular molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and symptomatic apical periodontitis received root canal treatment by a single operator following a standardized technique. Patients received an intra-pulpal injection of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and were randomly and equally assigned to two groups based on the temperature of the cartridge. The room-temperature group received a cartridge that was kept at 25-26 °C while for the cryoanesthesia group, the cartridge was cooled to a temperature of 4-5 °C. The HP-VAS scale was used to evaluate the patients' preoperative, intraoperative pre-injection, and intraoperative post-injection pain scores. The success rate was calculated by the lack of additional anesthesia following the intra-pulpal injection. Pain scores were statistically analyzed at a significance level of 0.05. Both the cryoanesthesia and the room-temperature groups were effective in significantly reducing the severity of intraoperative pain, where p < 0.001 for both groups. The cryoanesthesia group showed a 100% success rate compared to 80% for the room-temperature group without a statistically significant difference (p = 0.106). The difference in pain score reduction in both groups, however, was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Cryoanesthesia yielded more profound pulpal anesthesia compared to the room temperature intra-pulpal injection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.