Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136519›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Reducing annotation burden in physical activity research using vision language models.

Abram Schönfeldt, Benjamin Maylor, Xiaofang Chen, Ronald Clark, Aiden Doherty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abram SchönfeldtDepartment of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Benjamin MaylorDepartment of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Xiaofang ChenSchool of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Chengdu Medical College, Sichuan, China.
Ronald ClarkDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Aiden DohertyDepartment of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. aiden.doherty@ndph.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence RE/18/3/34214EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Health Data Science EP/S02428X/1National Natural Science Foundation of China 2192900, 82192901, 82192904, 81390540, 91846303Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project 2023ZD0510100Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 223100/Z/21/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data from wearable devices collected in free-living settings, and labelled with physical activity behaviours compatible with health research, are essential for both validating existing wearable-based measurement approaches and developing novel machine learning approaches. One common way of obtaining these labels relies on laborious human annotation of sequences of images captured by body-worn cameras. The aim of this study was to investigate whether open-source vision-language models could accurately annotate activity intensity classes in wearable camera-based validation studies, thereby reducing the annotation burden. We compared the performance of three vision language models and two discriminative models on two free-living validation studies with 161 and 111 participants, collected in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom and Sichuan, China, respectively, using the Autographer (OMG Life, defunct) wearable camera. We found that the best open-source vision-language model (VLM) and fine-tuned discriminative model (DM) achieved comparable performance when predicting sedentary behaviour from single images on unseen participants in the Oxfordshire study; median F

Indexed as

ExerciseWearable Electronic DevicesAdultChinaFemaleHumansLanguageMachine LearningMaleSedentary BehaviorUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41136519
PMCPMC12552446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.