Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41136516›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comprehensive evaluation of optimization algorithms for medical image segmentation.

Nijad A Al-Najdawi, Ali F Al-Shawabkeh, Sara Tedmori, Ibrahim I Ikhries, Osama Dorgham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nijad A Al-NajdawiDepartment of Computer Science, Prince Abdullah bin Ghazi Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, 19117, Jordan. n.al-najdawi@bau.edu.jo.
Ali F Al-ShawabkehDepartment of Scientific Basic Sciences, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Amman, 11134, Jordan.
Sara TedmoriDepartment of Computer Science, King Hussein School for Computing Sciences, Princess Sumaya University for Technology, Amman, 11941, Jordan.
Ibrahim I IkhriesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Amman, 11134, Jordan.
Osama DorghamDepartment of Computer Science, Prince Abdullah bin Ghazi Faculty of Information and Communication Technology, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Salt, 19117, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical image segmentation algorithms play a crucial role in assisting healthcare professionals with disease identification, research, and diagnosis. Numerous digital image segmentation methods have been developed, with multilevel thresholding techniques consistently outperforming others in terms of evaluation metrics. The standard algorithms include classical statistical methods, such as the Otsu and Kapur methods, which yield highly accurate results. However, when applied to multilevel thresholding, these methods incur significant computational costs, presenting an optimization challenge. In this work, a set of well-known optimization algorithms is integrated with Otsu's method to assess their effectiveness in reducing computational demands while preserving optimal segmentation quality. Experiments are conducted on publicly available datasets, including the TCIA dataset, particularly the COVID-19-AR collection. This work evaluates the performance of each optimization algorithm in combination with Otsu's method, highlighting those that achieve substantial reductions in computational cost and convergence time while maintaining a competitive level of segmentation quality.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCOVID-19Image Processing, Computer-AssistedHumansSARS-CoV-2Computational efficiencyMedical imagesMulti-level thresholdingOptimization algorithmsSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41136516
PMCPMC12552475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.