ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive evaluation of optimization algorithms for medical image segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical image segmentation algorithms play a crucial role in assisting healthcare professionals with disease identification, research, and diagnosis. Numerous digital image segmentation methods have been developed, with multilevel thresholding techniques consistently outperforming others in terms of evaluation metrics. The standard algorithms include classical statistical methods, such as the Otsu and Kapur methods, which yield highly accurate results. However, when applied to multilevel thresholding, these methods incur significant computational costs, presenting an optimization challenge. In this work, a set of well-known optimization algorithms is integrated with Otsu's method to assess their effectiveness in reducing computational demands while preserving optimal segmentation quality. Experiments are conducted on publicly available datasets, including the TCIA dataset, particularly the COVID-19-AR collection. This work evaluates the performance of each optimization algorithm in combination with Otsu's method, highlighting those that achieve substantial reductions in computational cost and convergence time while maintaining a competitive level of segmentation quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.