ArticleScientific reports2025
Simulation analysis of traffic flow stability for intelligent connected vehicles at mountain tunnel entrances considering nonlinear coupling effects.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The sudden changes in light and slope at the entrance of mountain tunnels can easily lead to unstable traffic flow, especially in mixed traffic flow containing ICV. The existing control methods are difficult to simultaneously address three challenges: dynamically changing lighting and slope environments, vehicle data privacy protection requirements, and insufficient adaptability to different tunnel scenarios. This study developed the MF3DQN-TF control framework to address these issues by integrating environmental perception and vehicle control. The framework first establishes a correlation model between light gradient and slope resistance, converting environmental risks into quantifiable control signals; Secondly, design an intelligent weight allocation mechanism to automatically increase the decision-making priority of environmental factors in strong light areas; Finally, a distributed training architecture is adopted to achieve knowledge sharing in multi tunnel scenarios while protecting vehicle data privacy. The verification results show that in typical tunnel testing scenarios, this framework significantly improves performance compared to traditional methods: the amplitude of speed fluctuations is reduced by about 40% compared to conventional control methods, the risk of rear end collisions is reduced to one-third of that of traditional reinforcement learning schemes, and the communication transmission volume is only half of that of typical federated learning methods. The verification results show that in typical tunnel testing scenarios, this framework reduces speed standard deviation by 41.4% (vs. PID control), cuts high-risk TTC < 2 s events by 62.5% (vs. centralized DQN), and nearly halves communication volume (46.2% reduction vs. FedProx). These improvements stem from the collaborative processing mechanism of the framework for environmental risks and vehicle status, providing a new technological path for safety control in complex tunnel environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.