ArticleScientific reports2025
Seismic stability analysis of cracked compound slopes considering soil heterogeneity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a seismic stability assessment framework for heterogeneous compound slopes with cracks, for example, highway embankment slopes. Based on limit analysis method, a kinematical approach incorporating a discretization technique is adopted to account for both global and local instabilities of cracked compound slopes under seismic excitations. The pseudo-static approach is applied to describe seismic forces. The soil heterogeneity is considered as linear variation along the depth. An implicit formula for stability factor (or safety factor) is derived through the work rate balance equation. The upper-bound solutions are calculated by combining a bisectional method with an optimization algorithm. The results are thoroughly verified through comparison with existing studies and finite element analysis. The results show that slope geometry plays a dominant role in governing slope stability and failure behavior. In particular, increasing the upper slope inclination significantly reduces the slope stability and induces a transition from local to global failure, especially under a larger depth coefficient. The presence of cracks further weakens slope stability, with their depth and location highly sensitive to geometric configuration. Furthermore, seismic excitation deepens cracks and shifts them upslope, inducing a transition from local to global failure as horizontal acceleration coefficient increases. Soil heterogeneity influences failure mechanisms that stronger upper soil deepens cracks via shear transition and shifts failure surfaces forward, exhibiting a "seesaw effect". The findings provide the guidance for the design of stable and crack-resistance slope engineering, particularly in topographically complex or geohazard-prone regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.