ArticleScientific reports2025
Aggregated decision system for financial resilience and performance enhancement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Organisations functioning in the current unpredictable financial and regulatory environment must formulate strategies that bolster financial resilience while simultaneously improving operational performance amid uncertainty. This study presents an integrated decision-making framework that merges advanced fuzzy logic with robust multi-criteria decision-making techniques to facilitate complex strategic evaluations. Several novel aggregation operators (AOs) are proposed to effectively capture expert hesitation, ambiguity, and nonlinear interactions among criteria. These include the q-rung orthopair fuzzy softmax-Einstein interactive weighted geometric (q-ROFSEIWG) operator and its other types of operators. The operators utilise softmax functions and Einstein interaction to more accurately represent real-world decision-making behaviour. The significance of each evaluation criterion is determined through the logarithmic percentage change-driven objective weighting (LOPCOW) method, which assesses variability in normalised data to facilitate a scale-sensitive and data-driven weighting approach. The MARCOS method is employed to rank strategic alternatives by measuring each option against ideal and anti-ideal solutions, facilitating a thorough utility-based evaluation. The proposed approach offers a flexible and reliable framework for the evaluation of complex decision problems, yielding insights that support consistent, data-driven, and uncertainty-aware decision-making in dynamic, multi-dimensional environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.