ArticleScientific reports2025
Non-linear interactions between intraocular, intracranial pressure and the retinal vascular pulse amplitude in the Fourier domain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The low explanatory power of a mixed effects linear model in evaluating interactions between retinal vascular pulse amplitude, intraocular pressure, and intracranial pressure suggests that these interactions are driven by non-linear dynamics. However, mathematical models inherently balance interpretability with predictive capability, and models explaining substantial variance may compromise interpretive clarity, a well-recognized limitation of artificial intelligence models, known as the black box problem. To explore these interactions, a generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) was applied to retinal venous and arterial pulse amplitude data in relation to intraocular and intracranial pressures. Each GAMM, constrained to prioritize interpretability, utilized 51 basis functions, and successfully achieved convergence. Partial effect plots and three-dimensional interaction visualizations were generated, revealing the geometric nature of these physiological relationships. The arterial and venous GAMMs explained 49.21 and 62.96% of the deviance respectively, describing a complex three-dimensional surface with pronounced curvature at intracranial pressures exceeding 25 cm water. Consistent with findings from a previously reported linear mixed-effects model, elevated intracranial pressure had an antipodal effect on the vascular pulse amplitude manifest as a reduction in venous and augmentation of the arterial pulse amplitudes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.